<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Political Debate Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com</link>
	<description>All New Political Debates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Do You Agree with Taxing Indoor Tanning Services?</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/do-you-agree-with-taxing-indoor-tanning-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/do-you-agree-with-taxing-indoor-tanning-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2551067/do_you_agree_with_taxing_indoor_tanning.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health Care Reform May Cost Tanners or Salons 10% More
	
		
			
						
		
		

	1			X
		

			
			
				tax indoor tanning			
			
				Credit: tanningsalonsweb.com&#160; &#124;&#160; &#169; tanningsalonsweb.com			
		
	
	The US Senate's 10% tax on indoor tanning is a small piece of the new healthcare reform package, currently in reconciliation phase between the House and Senate. It stems from the proposed 5% tax on cosmetic procedures that was in their health care reform bill.The indoor tanning tax follows a "health-based" theme. The government is targeting a service linked to skin cancer and a culprit to increasing health care costs. Lawmakers like to say this tax will help deter people from --&#62;
&#160;a behavior that is detrimental to their health while raising tax revenue in the present. Sound familiar...smokers, drinkers? The indoor tanning tax has raised concern among tanning salons and spa owners. Some will have to pass the tax onto the consumer while others may be able to foot the increase in hopes of keeping and attracting more customers. For some, tanning is surely addictive and while the government may want us to believe they are looking out for our best interest, most aren't so naive. It may, however, (and I hope it does) help raise awareness that frequenting the indoor or outdoor tanning bed really can have detrimental effects. I would have preferred to see both the 5% tax on cosmetic procedures and the 10% tax on indoor tanning services. While I feel health care reform is needed, I haven't been pleased with the direction it has gone thus far. The government is protecting big businesses (as usual) by not imposing tax on Botox or facelifts. The small business and consumer will be most affected by the proposed tanning tax to aid in funding reform. This won't bring nearly as much tax revenue as the tax on cosmetics would have.I am in favor of the tanning tax. Smokers pay outrageous taxes (and get wrinkles) to counterbalance future health care cost and my Mom always said, "Beauty must suffer" so, welcome aboard indoor tanners! Let's legalize marijuana too. That's where substantial amounts of tax revenue could come from to help with health care cost and reform. Furthermore, marijuana advocates in California are for increasing taxes on medical cannabis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health Care Reform May Cost Tanners or Salons 10% More</p>
<p>	1			X</p>
<p>				tax indoor tanning			</p>
<p>				Credit: tanningsalonsweb.com&nbsp; |&nbsp; &copy; tanningsalonsweb.com			</p>
<p>	The US Senate&#8217;s 10% taxation on indoor tanning is a small square of the brand new healthcare remodel package, now in settlement proviso in between the House and Senate. It stems from the due 5% taxation on cosmetic procedures which was in their illness caring remodel bill.The indoor tanning taxation follows a &#8220;health-based&#8221; theme. The supervision is targeting a use related to skin cancer and a law-breaker to augmenting illness caring costs. Lawmakers similar to to contend this taxation will assistance deter people from &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;a function which is unpropitious to their illness whilst raising taxation income in the present. Sound familiar&#8230;smokers, drinkers? The indoor tanning taxation has lifted regard between tanning salons and sauna owners. Some will have to pass the taxation onto the consumer whilst others might be means to feet the enlarge in hopes of gripping and attracting some-more customers. For some, tanning is certainly addictive and whilst the supervision might wish us to hold they have been seeking out for the many appropriate interest, many aren&#8217;t so naive. It may, however, (and I goal it does) assistance lift recognition which frequenting the indoor or outside tanning bed unequivocally can have unpropitious effects. I would have elite to see both the 5% taxation on cosmetic procedures and the 10% taxation on indoor tanning services. While I feel illness caring remodel is needed, I haven&#8217;t been gratified with the citation it has left to illustrate far. The supervision is safeguarding big businesses (as usual) by not commanding taxation on Botox or facelifts. The small commercial operation and consumer will be many influenced by the due tanning taxation to assist in appropriation reform. This won&#8217;t move scarcely as most taxation income as the taxation on war paint would have.I am in preference of the tanning tax. Smokers compensate vast taxes (and get wrinkles) to blow destiny illness caring price and my Mom regularly said, &#8220;Beauty contingency suffer&#8221; so, acquire aboard indoor tanners! Let&#8217;s approve pot too. That&#8217;s where estimable amounts of taxation income could come from to assistance with illness caring price and reform. Furthermore, pot advocates in California have been for augmenting taxes on healing cannabis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/do-you-agree-with-taxing-indoor-tanning-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Rules for the TSA</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/new-rules-for-the-tsa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/new-rules-for-the-tsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2551273/new_rules_for_the_tsa.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was wondering when there would be new rules since the Christmas underwear bomber tried to blow up a plane.  Much as I am concerned about the full body scan at all airports, I can understand why those new rules that I heard about.I can agree to the ones that I heard and can agree with.  One of the rules which says that if anyone is traveling to America from a country where terrorist are considered to originate or even through those countries, they will have to submit to a more detailed search before boarding the --&#62;
&#160;plane.  I do not think that anyone could consider this as racial profiling because it covers the countries from where you originate your journey not the color of anyone's skin.  Now of course, there may be those who will choose to go the way of racial profiling but I think that number of people will be minimal and not the majority.We must be willing to accept that the majority should rule when it comes to the safety of us all and those who are in the minority should accept the majority's decision and then resign themselves to making sure that our civil rights are not stomped on.  I say this because many times we spend so much time and energy fighting to set the rules that we often become so divided that instead of moving forward, we move our nation backwards.  There has been a lot of decisions made that I do not agree with and would have enjoyed experiencing the other choice but continuing the fight for the other choice does not allow me the opportunity to help give the choice made a proper chance for success.  We often times are so pissed that we did not get what we wanted that we spend our ever waking moment trying to make sure the decision fails so that we will feel justified in saying "told you so."Not sure what the other new rules are and if I will be able to agree with them as much as I can with the one mentioned above but I am willing to listen.  No one person has all of the answers and having so many thoughtful and smart people in this nation is a blessing that we should take advantage of.  We can make these new rules work or give them the best opportunity to if we would just allow others to express their concerns as we want others to allow us to express our own.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering when there would be brand brand brand brand new manners given the Yuletide hoop skirt bomber attempted to blow up a plane.  Much as I am endangered about the full physique indicate at all airports, I can assimilate since those brand brand brand brand new manners which I listened about.I can determine to the ones which I listened and can determine with.  One of the manners which says which if any one is roving to America from a republic where militant have been deliberate to issue or even by those countries, they will have to contention to a some-more minute poke prior to boarding the &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;plane.  I do not think which any one could cruise this as secular profiling since it covers the countries from where you issue your tour not the color of anyone&#8217;s skin.  Now of course, there might be those who will select to go the approach of secular profiling but I think which series of people will be minimal and not the majority.We contingency be peaceful to accept which the infancy should order when it comes to the reserve of us all and those who have been in the minority should accept the majority&#8217;s preference and afterwards renounce themselves to creation certain which the polite rights have been not stomped on.  I contend this since most times we outlay so most time and appetite fighting to set the manners which we mostly turn so widely separated which instead of relocating forward, we move the republic backwards.  There has been a lot of decisions done which I do not determine with and would have enjoyed experiencing the alternative preference but stability the quarrel for the alternative preference does not concede me the event to assistance give the preference done a correct possibility for success.  We mostly times have been so pissed which we did not get what we longed for which we outlay the ever waking impulse perplexing to have certain the preference fails so which we will feel fit in observant &#8220;told you so.&#8221;Not certain what the alternative brand brand brand brand new manners have been and if I will be means to determine with them as most as I can with the one referred to on top of but I am peaceful to listen.  No one chairman has all of the answers and carrying so most courteous and intelligent people in this republic is a good fortune which we should take value of.  We can have these brand brand brand brand new manners work or give them the most appropriate event to if we would only concede others to demonstrate their concerns as we wish others to concede us to demonstrate the own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/new-rules-for-the-tsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year Around Schooling</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/year-around-schooling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/year-around-schooling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2551265/year_around_schooling.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was channel surfing this afternoon and heard CNN's Don Lemmon say something about the next big agenda item of the Obama Administration was year around schools.  At first I thought I had heard him wrong but it appears that I heard him correctly.  After hearing this, I thought a few minutes --&#62;
&#160;then had a conversation with my teenage daughter about year around school.  Here is what she came up with.At first she threw a major fit thinking that it would start tomorrow because daddy said so.  Then she jumped to throwing up her hands and saying that it didn't matter because she does not have a voice anyway.  After I calmed her down, I sat her down and explained some things to her.  I first explained that it would not start tomorrow because it was only being considered and nothing ever moves that fast in this world.  I explained to her that it would probably take quite some time to get past the argument stage before anything would even begin to get started.  I then explained to her that she does have a voice in what happens and what happens does affect her.  She has a voice because if this country stands for anything, it's that we all have a voice.  Whether we choose to use it is one thing but not using it is our individual decision and our individual decision alone.  She has a voice because as a parent, it's my place to make sure that she does.  She needs to know that change does not come thoughts alone, it takes action and the main available action to all of us is the use of our voices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was channel surfing this afternoon and listened CNN&#8217;s Don Lemmon contend something about the subsequent big bulletin object of the Obama Administration was year around schools.  At initial I suspicion I had listened him wrong but it appears which I listened him correctly.  After conference this, I suspicion a couple of mins &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;then had a review with my teenage daughter about year around school.  Here is what she came up with.At initial she threw a vital fit meditative which it would proceed tomorrow since dad pronounced so.  Then she jumped to throwing up her hands and observant which it didn&#8217;t have a difference since she does not have a voice anyway.  After I calmed her down, I sat her down and explained a little things to her.  I initial explained which it would not proceed tomorrow since it was usually being deliberate and zero ever moves which quick in this world.  I explained to her which it would substantially take utterly a little time to get past the evidence theatre prior to anything would even proceed to get started.  I afterwards explained to her which she does have a voice in what happens and what happens does start her.  She has a voice since if this nation stands for anything, it&#8217;s which we all have a voice.  Whether we select to have make use of of it is one thing but not regulating it is the particular preference and the particular preference alone.  She has a voice since as a parent, it&#8217;s my place to have certain which she does.  She needs to know which shift does not come thoughts alone, it takes movement and the main accessible movement to all of us is the have make use of of of the voices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/year-around-schooling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indoor Tanning Gets 10% Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/indoor-tanning-gets-10-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/indoor-tanning-gets-10-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2551255/indoor_tanning_gets_10_tax.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No More Tan, Government Says"We want to decrease the amount of cases of melanoma caused by indoor tanning salons," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says. "If we tax indoor tanning salons, less people will want to get tans and this will reduce the rate of --&#62;
&#160;melanoma significantly. Also, we will be able to raise over $2 billion over the next 10 years to offset the costs of the health care reform that will provide millions of more Americans with health insurance."Wow, here we go. Billions and billions of taxpayer dollars spent on bailing out the auto industry (personally I'm tired of hearing and talking about this because it is so upsetting), a $787 billion stimulus package, and a defense bill that costs billions more (I'm for a bill that strengthens our military, but the one put together by Congress is mostly pork). Now the debt level has been raised to over $12 trillion. So, the solution is to tax tanning salons and pay all of that money back with $2.7 billion over 10 years? What a joke.You know, this goes along with the idea of taxing sodas and other soft drinks. Every single thing that a person enjoys is going to be taxed. With all of the problems in the world today, people should be able to enjoy a few things and not have to worry about being taxed for it. People very well know that going to a tanning salon can increase one's risk of cancer (by as much as 75% for people under 30). Even so, it is the person's personal decision to get tanned just like it is a person's personal decision to drink soda. For instance, my aunt has gotten tans her entire life. She has never gotten cancer. If a person wants to look wrinkly earlier in life or wants to risk getting cancer, well, let them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No More Tan, Government Says&#8221;We wish to diminution the volume of cases of cancer caused by indoor tanning salons,&#8221; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says. &#8220;If we taxation indoor tanning salons, reduction people will wish to get tans and this will revoke the rate of &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;melanoma significantly. Also, we will be means to lift over $2 billion over the subsequent 10 years to equivalent the costs of the illness caring remodel which will yield millions of some-more Americans with illness insurance.&#8221;Wow, here we go. Billions and billions of taxpayer dollars outlayed on bailing out the automobile attention (personally I&#8217;m sleepy of conference and articulate about this since it is so upsetting), a $787 billion impulse package, and a invulnerability check which costs billions some-more (I&#8217;m for a check which strengthens the military, but the one put together by Congress is often pork). Now the debt turn has been lifted to over $12 trillion. So, the resolution is to taxation tanning salons and compensate all of which income behind with $2.7 billion over 10 years? What a joke.You know, this goes along with the thought of fatiguing sodas and alternative soft drinks. Every singular thing which a chairman enjoys is going to be taxed. With all of the problems in the universe today, people should be means to suffer a couple of things and not have to be concerned about being taxed for it. People really good know which going to a tanning reception room can enlarge one&#8217;s risk of cancer (by as most as 75% for people underneath 30). Even so, it is the person&#8217;s personal preference to get dark-skinned only similar to it is a person&#8217;s personal preference to splash soda. For instance, my aunt has gotten tans her complete life. She has never gotten cancer. If a chairman wants to demeanour wrinkly progressing in hold up or wants to risk removing cancer, well, let them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/indoor-tanning-gets-10-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Embassy Closing in Yemen</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/american-embassy-closing-in-yemen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/american-embassy-closing-in-yemen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2551247/american_embassy_closing_in_yemen.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first heard about the administration closing the American embassy in Yemen, I was quite surprised.  I don't think that I had ever heard of this before and had to think about this for some time before understanding why it happened.My understanding is that as we assist the Yemen Government in attacking al-Qaida in Yemen, they would attack us in return.  Closing the embassy and moving the Americans out of harms way could allow us to support those attacks even more.  Even though closing the embassy does not mean that --&#62;
&#160;we are washing our hands of Yemen, it does mean that the terrorist will have to search long and hard for an American target for retaliation and that itself may not be a bad thing.I had heard that the numbers of al-Qaida members were small and that increasing of the sponsored attacks should go a long way in driving them out if not capturing or killing those who are set on doing the same thing to us.  My major concern is the time-lapse between discovery of an al-Qaida stronghold where top members are located and the authorization of attack.  I have heard some report that by the time authorization for an attack is given; those members have been given the time necessary to leave the area.  I would hope that this is not true but if it is, why would we waste time attacking a place where the results would not be worthwhile?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I initial listened about the administration department shutting the American embassy in Yemen, I was utterly surprised.  I do not think which I had ever listened of this prior to and had to think about this for a little time prior to bargain because it happened.My bargain is which as we await the Yemen Government in aggressive al-Qaida in Yemen, they would conflict us in return.  Closing the embassy and relocating the Americans out of harms approach could concede us to await those attacks even more.  Even yet shutting the embassy does not meant which &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;we have been soaking the hands of Yemen, it does meant which the militant will have to poke prolonged and tough for an American aim for plea and which itself might not be a bad thing.I had listened which the numbers of al-Qaida members were small and which augmenting of the sponsored attacks should go a prolonged approach in pushing them out if not capturing or murdering those who have been set on you do the same thing to us.  My vital regard is the time-lapse in between find of an al-Qaida building where tip members have been located and the authorisation of attack.  I have listened a little inform which by the time authorisation for an conflict is given; those members have been since the time required to leave the area.  I would goal which this is not loyal but if it is, because would we rubbish time aggressive a place where the formula would not be worthwhile?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/american-embassy-closing-in-yemen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mother Jones is the Best Magazine in America</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/mother-jones-is-the-best-magazine-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/mother-jones-is-the-best-magazine-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2550947/mother_jones_is_the_best_magazine_in.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You Should Subscribe!I think Mother Jones is the best magazine in America.You should all be reading it, and those of you who can should be subscribing or donating money to the Mother Jones Investigative FundThey do good things.They do things that the mainstream media ought to do.Here are some FAQ about Mother Jones, from their --&#62;
&#160;FAQMother Jones was a person, a radical reformer who was called "the most dangerous woman in America".   Her real name was Mary Harris Jones, she lived from 1837-1930, and she founded the Industrial Workers of the World and played a vital role in unionizing coal miners and stopping child labor.  You can also read more about her here. Mother Jones is also a magazine, founded in 1974, run as a nonprofit, and dependent on donations.  It won a National Magazine Award for General Excellence.  Michael Moore is a former editor.  There's lots more info at the two websites linked above.Month after month, Mother Jones is full of articles that get to the real truth of the news and the times.  Debunking conservative nonsense, exposing corporate wrongdoing, holding politicians to a high standard.  It's also full of good writing, some humor, and some interesting ads.What sort of writing is in Mother Jones?Let's look at the current issue:The main topic this month  is titled Too Big to Jail.  Bingo.  Corporate crime.  A lot of them get away with it.  The articles in that section include:Moral bankruptcy.on how some of the richest people in monetary terms are pretty poor in moral ones. Thank you sir, may we have another?  which is about why we aren't mad at bankersAlways be foreclosing  which is about banks and foreclosures.Capital city (subtitle: It's hard to kick the finance lobby off the team when they own the place)Faces of Greed (about the people in the Madoff gang who are still free and still rich)But it's not all grim.  They always leaven things with some good news, like a story about how prison inmates are helping tame horses, while the horses tame the men.  Or another about prisoners helping tend prairie wildflowersThen, they expose Ross Douthat, the new NY Times columnist, as a real right wing nut.Plus more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Should Subscribe!I think Mother Jones is the many appropriate repository in America.You should all be celebration of the mass it, and those of you who can should be subscribing or donating income to the Mother Jones Investigative FundThey do great things.They do things that the mainstream media ought to do.Here have been a little FAQ about Mother Jones, from their &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;FAQMother Jones was a person, a in advance reformer who was called &#8220;the many dangerous lady in America&#8221;.   Her genuine name was Mary Harris Jones, she lived from 1837-1930, and she founded the Industrial Workers of the World and played a critical purpose in unionizing spark miners and interlude kid labor.  You can additionally review some-more about her here. Mother Jones is additionally a magazine, founded in 1974, run as a nonprofit, and contingent on donations.  It won a National Magazine Award for General Excellence.  Michael Moore is a former editor.  There&#8217;s lots some-more info at the dual websites related above.Month after month, Mother Jones is full of articles that get to the genuine law of the headlines and the times.  Debunking regressive nonsense, exposing corporate wrongdoing, land politicians to a tall standard.  It&#8217;s additionally full of great writing, a little humor, and a little engaging ads.What arrange of essay is in Mother Jones?Let&#8217;s demeanour at the stream issue:The main subject this month  is patrician Too Big to Jail.  Bingo.  Corporate crime.  A lot of them get divided with it.  The articles in that territory include:Moral bankruptcy.on how a little of the richest people in financial conditions have been flattering bad in dignified ones. Thank you sir, might we have another?  that is about because we aren&#8217;t insane at bankersAlways be foreclosing  that is about banks and foreclosures.Capital city (subtitle: It&#8217;s tough to flog the financial run off the group when they own the place)Faces of Greed (about the people in the Madoff squad who have been still giveaway and still rich)But it&#8217;s not all grim.  They regularly leaven things with a little great news, similar to a story about how jail inmates have been assisting tame horses, whilst the horses tame the men.  Or an additional about prisoners assisting lend towards level wildflowersThen, they display Ross Douthat, the brand new NY Times columnist, as a genuine right wing nut.Plus more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/mother-jones-is-the-best-magazine-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax on Tanning is a Step to Far</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/tax-on-tanning-is-a-step-to-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/tax-on-tanning-is-a-step-to-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2550803/tax_on_tanning_is_a_step_to_far.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that everywhere you go you have to pay a tax for something and it is starting to get out of hand. Recently the United States Senate passed a bill that called for a 10 percent tax on all indoor tanning salons. This tax will affect hundreds of --&#62;
&#160;thousands of tanners across the country and many people are questioning the intent of the senateIt is well known that the government likes to tax things that are commonly used in order to get a higher profit. They also like to tax things that are considered unhealthy, in an effort to make people stop doing these things. One example of this that stands out the most is the high tax on cigarettes. Smoking is without a doubt unhealthy. The government likes to tax cigarettes for two purposes. One purpose is to discourage smoking and the other is to gain money.This same thing is occurring with indoor tanning. Indoor tanning is still a new concept that has been known to cause skin damage in people who tan on a daily basis without protective lotions or oils. There is such a thing as safe tanning or tanning in moderation but the government still stresses that tanning has been linked to skin cancer. Because of this the government has decided to tax indoor tanning and discourage people from tanning. But it is time to realize that this is out of control.Taxing people for tanning is just a step away from taxing people to get their hair cut or taxing people who get facials, or taxing people who have massages. Taxes do serve a useful purpose but things are starting to go a bit far. When every service starts to be taxed then people will find alternatives to these services like tanning outside or even doing under the table tanning. People will always find a way around these taxes and in the end the government will loose money and the trust of the people. People who work hard and have jobs might start spending more on taxes then on the products and services themselves. Where is this tanning tax money going? This is a question that people need to think about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems which everywhere you go you have to compensate a taxation for something and it is starting to get out of hand. Recently the United States Senate upheld a check which called for a 10 percent taxation on all indoor tanning salons. This taxation will begin hundreds of &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;thousands of tanners opposite the nation and many people have been disbelief the vigilant of the senateIt is good well well known which the supervision likes to taxation things which have been ordinarily used in sequence to get a aloft profit. They additionally similar to to taxation things which have been deliberate unhealthy, in an bid to have people stop you do these things. One e.g. of this which stands out the many is the tall taxation on cigarettes. Smoking is but a disbelief unhealthy. The supervision likes to taxation cigarettes for dual purposes. One role is to daunt smoking and the alternative is to benefit money.This same thing is occurring with indoor tanning. Indoor tanning is still a brand new judgment which has been well well known to means skin repairs in people who tan on a each day basement but protecting lotions or oils. There is such a thing as protected tanning or tanning in mediation but the supervision still stresses which tanning has been related to skin cancer. Because of this the supervision has motionless to taxation indoor tanning and daunt people from tanning. But it is time to comprehend which this is out of control.Taxing people for tanning is only a step divided from fatiguing people to get their hair cut or fatiguing people who get facials, or fatiguing people who have massages. Taxes do offer a utilitarian role but things have been starting to go a bit far. When each use starts to be taxed afterwards people will find alternatives to these services similar to tanning outward or even you do underneath the list tanning. People will regularly find a approach around these taxes and in the finish the supervision will lax income and the certitude of the people. People who work tough and have jobs competence begin spending some-more on taxes afterwards on the products and services themselves. Where is this tanning taxation income going? This is a subject which people need to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/tax-on-tanning-is-a-step-to-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Kerry Banned from Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/john-kerry-banned-from-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/john-kerry-banned-from-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2550633/john_kerry_banned_from_iran.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for the "Chicago Way" for Iran
	
		
			
						
		
		

	1			X
		

			
			
				Senator John Kerry			
			
				Credit: Wikipedia Commons&#160; &#124;&#160; &#169; United States Senate (public domain)			
		
	
	It looks like that Senator John Kerry will not be going to Iran after all. John Kerry, the liberal Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had announced his desire to go to Tehran. The Iranian government has denied a visa to Senator Kerry.Senator Kerry's office has denied that there were "immediate" plans for Kerry to travel to Iran. It looks like, thanks to the Iranian government's hostility, that Iran --&#62;
John Kerry Banned from Iran&#160;has no plans to receive him.Iran's attitude toward the proposed visit by Senator John Kerry is a little curious. In times past, Iran welcomed diplomatic free lancers, especially if they could be used to embarrass the United States. Ramsey Clark, the uber left wing former Attorney General, flew to Tehran during the middle of the Iranian hostage crisis and participated in something called a "Crimes of America" show trial.It is likely that the Iranians have concluded that John Kerry was not, contrary to appearances, free lancing, but was serving as a clandestine emissary from the Obama Administration. The Iranians have concluded, quite rightly, that Obama is weak and that there is no point in talking to him or any emissary representing him.If President Obama is paying attention, and there is reason to wonder if he is, then he would have to conclude that the time for quiet diplomacy concerning Iran has passed, if it really ever was there to begin with. The time has come for sterner measures.But which measures, one might ask. Obama is likely to try economic sanctions against Iran, though those tend to act slowly unless vigorously enforced, which is unlikely. Economic sanctions alone would likely act too slowly to affect Iran's drive for a nuclear arsenal.Stepping up clandestine and open support of the Iranian protestors would be a good idea. It is entirely possible that the protests would reach critical mass, overthrowing the Iranian theocracy, and establishing a new, more friendly government.Other options include an embargo of refined gasoline, which Iran, though an oil exporting country, must import and air strikes against Iranian nuclear and other military sites.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for the &#8220;Chicago Way&#8221; for Iran</p>
<p>	1			X</p>
<p>				Senator John Kerry			</p>
<p>				Credit: Wikipedia Commons&nbsp; |&nbsp; &copy; United States Senate (public domain)			</p>
<p>	It looks similar to that Senator John Kerry will not be going to Iran after all. John Kerry, the magnanimous Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had voiced his enterprise to go to Tehran. The Iranian supervision has denied a visa to Senator Kerry.Senator Kerry&#8217;s bureau has denied that there were &#8220;immediate&#8221; skeleton for Kerry to transport to Iran. It looks like, interjection to the Iranian government&#8217;s hostility, that Iran &#8211;&gt;<br />
John Kerry Banned from Iran&nbsp;has no skeleton to embrace him.Iran&#8217;s perspective toward the due revisit by Senator John Kerry is a small curious. In times past, Iran welcomed tactful giveaway lancers, generally if they could be used to confuse the United States. Ramsey Clark, the uber left wing former Attorney General, flew to Tehran during the center of the Iranian warrant predicament and participated in something called a &#8220;Crimes of America&#8221; show trial.It is expected that the Iranians have resolved that John Kerry was not, discordant to appearances, giveaway lancing, but was portion as a surreptitious intermediary from the Obama Administration. The Iranians have concluded, utterly rightly, that Obama is diseased and that there is no indicate in articulate to him or any intermediary representing him.If President Obama is profitable attention, and there is reason to consternation if he is, afterwards he would have to interpretation that the time for still tact connected with Iran has passed, if it unequivocally ever was there to proceed with. The time has come for sterner measures.But that measures, one competence ask. Obama is expected to try mercantile sanctions opposite Iran, yet those lend towards to action solemnly unless energetically enforced, that is unlikely. Economic sanctions alone would expected action as well solemnly to start Iran&#8217;s expostulate for a chief arsenal.Stepping up surreptitious and open await of the Iranian protestors would be a great idea. It is wholly probable that the protests would strech vicious mass, overthrowing the Iranian theocracy, and substantiating a new, some-more accessible government.Other options embody an keep out of polished gasoline, that Iran, yet an oil exporting country, contingency import and air strikes opposite Iranian chief and alternative troops sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/john-kerry-banned-from-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Rasmussen &#8211; the Latest Enemy of the People</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/scott-rasmussen-the-latest-enemy-of-the-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/scott-rasmussen-the-latest-enemy-of-the-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2550499/scott_rasmussen_the_latest_enemy_of.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't like the Poll Numbers? Let's Shoot the Pollster!Having failed to make either Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin the number one enemy of the people, the Obama White House and Congressional Democrats have hit upon a new albeit unusual candidate. His name is Scott Rasmussen.Politico is reporting that the main cause of ire from the Democrats is that the poll that Rasmussen runs has consistently shown a slide in President Barack Obama's popularity and a skyrocketing of the President's unpopularity. Obama supporters accuse Rasmussen of "under polling" Obama. --&#62;
Scott Rasmussen - the Latest Enemy of the People&#160;Rasmussen results do tend to be a little less favorable to Obama and Democrats than other polling outfits.  Democrats also accuse Rasmussen of framing the questions to get a certain result.It also likely doesn't help that Rasmussen is often quoted on conservative talk radio such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and that Scott Rasmussen actually appears as a guest on various shows on the Fox News Network. For liberals, that is like presenting a red flag to a bull.The problem is, Rasmussen has tended to be very accurate in predicting the outcome of various elections. According to Politico:"Rasmussen is quick to point out the accuracy of his surveys &#8212; noting how close his firm was to predicting the final outcome in this fall's New Jersey governor's race. (Rasmussen's final survey in the race showed Republican Chris Christie edging out Gov. Jon Corzine 46 percent to 43 percent. Christie beat Corzine 48 percent to 45 percent on Election Day.) And he argues that he was among the first pollsters to show Obama narrowing the gap with Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary. "Last year, the progressive website FiveThirtyEight.com's pollster ratings, based on the 2008 presidential primaries, awarded Rasmussen the third-highest mark for its accuracy in predicting the outcome of the contests. And Rasmussen's final poll of the 2008 general election &#8212; showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent &#8212; closely mirrored the election's outcome. "]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t similar to the Poll Numbers? Let&#8217;s Shoot the Pollster!Having unsuccessful to have possibly Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin the series one rivalry of the people, the Obama White House and Congressional Democrats have strike on a brand new despite surprising candidate. His name is Scott Rasmussen.Politico is stating which the main means of madness from the Democrats is which the check which Rasmussen runs has consistently shown a slip in President Barack Obama&#8217;s recognition and a skyrocketing of the President&#8217;s unpopularity. Obama supporters credit Rasmussen of &#8220;under polling&#8221; Obama. &#8211;&gt;<br />
Scott Rasmussen &#8211; the Latest Enemy of the People&nbsp;Rasmussen formula do lend towards to be a small reduction auspicious to Obama and Democrats than alternative polling outfits.  Democrats additionally credit Rasmussen of framing the questions to get a sure result.It additionally expected doesn&#8217;t assistance which Rasmussen is mostly quoted on regressive speak air wave such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and which Scott Rasmussen essentially appears as a guest on assorted shows on the Fox News Network. For liberals, which is similar to presenting a red dwindle to a bull.The complaint is, Rasmussen has tended to be really correct in presaging the result of assorted elections. According to Politico:&#8221;Rasmussen is discerning to indicate out the correctness of his surveys &mdash; observant how tighten his organisation was to presaging the last result in this fall&#8217;s New Jersey governor&#8217;s race. (Rasmussen&#8217;s last consult in the competition showed Republican Chris Christie circumference out Gov. Jon Corzine 46 percent to 43 percent. Christie kick Corzine 48 percent to 45 percent on Election Day.) And he argues which he was between the initial pollsters to show Obama squeezing the opening with Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary. &#8220;Last year, the on-going website FiveThirtyEight.com&#8217;s pollster ratings, formed on the 2008 presidential primaries, awarded Rasmussen the third-highest symbol for the correctness in presaging the result of the contests. And Rasmussen&#8217;s last check of the 2008 ubiquitous choosing &mdash; display Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent &mdash; closely mirrored the election&#8217;s outcome. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/scott-rasmussen-the-latest-enemy-of-the-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iranian Soccer Federation Accidentally Wishes Happy New Year to Israeli Counterpart</title>
		<link>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/iranian-soccer-federation-accidentally-wishes-happy-new-year-to-israeli-counterpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/iranian-soccer-federation-accidentally-wishes-happy-new-year-to-israeli-counterpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2550365/iranian_soccer_federation_accidentally.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1			X
		

			
			
				Iranian National Football Team			
			
				Credit: MesserWoland&#160; &#124;&#160; &#169; Wikimedia Commons			
		
	
	The Iranian Soccer Federation reportedly sent an accidental 'Happy New Year's' greeting to their soccer counterparts in Israel. The director of foreign relations for Islamic Republic's Football Federation says he did not mean to send the greeting. In fact, he was probably chagrined about the mix-up. Iranians, on principle, don't wish a Happy New Year to Israelis. Nor a Merry Christmas, for even more obvious --&#62;
&#160;reasons.How did the Israelis respond? "Happy new year to all the good people of Iran" Read the article HERE.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1			X</p>
<p>				Iranian National Football Team			</p>
<p>				Credit: MesserWoland&nbsp; |&nbsp; &copy; Wikimedia Commons			</p>
<p>	The Iranian Soccer Federation reportedly sent an random &#8216;Happy New Year&#8217;s&#8217; nod to their soccer counterparts in Israel. The executive of unfamiliar family for Islamic Republic&#8217;s Football Federation says he did not meant to send the greeting. In fact, he was substantially embarrassed about the mix-up. Iranians, on principle, do not instruct a Happy New Year to Israelis. Nor a Merry Christmas, for even some-more viewable &#8211;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;reasons.How did the Israelis respond? &#8220;Happy brand new year to all the great people of Iran&#8221; Read the essay HERE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicaldebateshow.com/iranian-soccer-federation-accidentally-wishes-happy-new-year-to-israeli-counterpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
